The National Council on Identity Policy (NCIDP) - Firewire News Case Study: California DMV RICO Identity Crimes

The National Council on Identity Policy (NCIDP) was born of the struggles of one tenacious survivor of domestic violence and stalking. The NCIDP continues her work with the help of many. Read more about the NCIDP...

(Firewire News) - In one of the largest consolidated RICO conspiracies in the world, members of the California Department of Motor Vehicles are so comfortable in their abuse of power and violence as to advertise it across the state (DMV FFDL 05) and on the Internet (http://dmv.ca.gov/dl/dl_info.htm#two504).

IIULA status:

The California Department of Motor Vehicles (Cal DMV) is known by the NCIDP to have had previous full notice of a standardized Survivor's Identity Information User License Agreement (IIULA) for many years and prior to any contemporaneous incidents.

Every breach of law perpetrated in similar cases, as discussed here and noted in the IIULA, is well known by the Cal DMV, the California Secretary of State and subordinate agencies to be felony violent assault crimes before these perpetrations are committed upon victims.

The perpetrators of these crimes may not claim any ignorance of these laws, and must be presumed to be perpetrating these violent felony assault crimes with the willing and willful intent to do violence to the victims, including against survivors such as to willfully precipitate homicidal assaults upon such victims.

It begins with the errant members of the California DMV publishing a stated refusal to honor legal name changes, except those validated by a "true full name document". As the NCIDP website clearly discloses on its "Basic Identity" Page, at law the only contemporaneously valid and sound documentation of any individual's true or legal identity is that person's own attestation of it. Yet, the errant members of the California DMV go on to list only secondary documentation of identity as acceptable. Worse, they go on to completely misdefine "true identity" as being identical to "birth identity", a patently false definition for any legal purpose or domain, such as governmental purposes (Christianson v. King County (S Ct., 1915), et al.), and completely anathema to the U.S. Constitutional prohibition against governmental dictation of individual identities (Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey (1992); Entick v. Carrington and Three Other King's Messengers (1765); Lawrence v. Texas (2003); et al.).

Moreover, California statutes specifically prohibit any disparate treatment of legal identity changes (CCCP Sec 1279.5(a)). That is, state law specifically declares that common usage identity changes may not be dishonored or in any way given any less regard than an identity change declared with court action, a reiteration of the rights in such matters guaranteed to individuals under the federal Constitution according to the courts. Violating these laws are: a violent assault upon the victims (Keeble v. Hickeringill (QB, 1707)); a violation of the victims' civil rights (18 U.S.C. § 241) and under color of authority (18 U.S.C. § 242); dishonest service (18 U.S.C. § 1346) using the Internet [by wire] (18 U.S.C. § 1343) and mail (18 U.S.C. § 1341); making unauthorized use of identity information (18 U.S.C. § 1028) and in an aggravated manner (18 U.S.C. § 1028A); extorted by robbery (18 U.S.C. § 1951) using violent assault (Keeble v. Hickeringill (QB, 1707)); if transmitted to any federal agent, agency or authority a false statement to same (18 U.S.C. § 1001); if transmitted out of state at any time, federally prohibited transportation of stolen goods (18 U.S.C. § 2314); a racket conspired (18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968) by senior management reliant upon abuse of junior 'innocent dupes' to the racket (U.S. v. Cianci (S Ct., 2004)), who are unknowingly enlisted into acting as the front-line perpetrators and, therefore themselves victimized. Counts of each of the aforementioned crimes accrue for each individual victimized by these perpetrators.

Within governmental and other legal realms, as Christianson v. King County (S Ct, 1915) and numerous other cases make clear, a person's true legal name is as that person determines and states it to be regardless of birth name or any other form of governmental or other authorization of it, and it must be respected or such legal entities give up all authority or interests in the individual. Until the U.S. Constitution is changed to declare the U.S. to no longer be a nation of liberty and freedom, the Supreme Court and other rulings hold that this is the law of the land.

The conspiring members of the California DMV appear to be attempting a gross and transparent subterfuge of the proper rule of law in purposely misdefining "true full name" contrary to legal definitions of true legal name. Indeed, the DMV infiltrators avoid using the word "legal" in a vain and criminal effort to divorce the DMV entirely from the rule of law and the legal system. In so doing, they have not only created a RICO enterprise (U.S. v. Cianci (S Ct, 2004)), but also demolished entirely the legal validity and merit of the entire system of records held by the DMV.

The perpetrating members of the California DMV have purposely and statedly attempted to take the DMV entirely outside the bounds of law, and in so doing have committed millions of serious and violent felony crimes, and turned the information that the DMV holds into "Fruit of the Poison Tree". When a state actor engages in criminal activities that yield information, the courts have long held the evidentiary value of that information and all information that arises or is discovered from it to be corrupted and inadmissible, known as the "Fruit of the Poison Tree" doctrine.

Operating in this manner, the actions of members of the California DMV are anathema to the recently enacted Federal Real ID Act (P.L. 109-13) [yet to be implemented], as well as to the earlier Patriot Act (P.L. 107-56). The Real ID Act (P.L. 109-13) mandates upon the states accurate representation of the legal identities of individuals, a mandate which must be met in a manner consistent with Constitutionally protected identity law, and issue ID in a person's legal name. Since the Real ID Act (P.L. 109-13) mandates solicitation of birth certificates and other documents, states must first issue new birth certificates to individuals upon identity change in order to comply with the legal mandates of the Real ID Act (P.L. 109-13). States that fail to issue such new birth certificates would prevent access to birth certificates by any DMV under the Real ID Act by causing such access to become an illegal solicitation/collection of former identity information relating to an individual, or otherwise illegally disseminating any cross references between current chosen identity and former identity.

Moreover, since the existing records represent falsifications of information built upon a hornets nest of criminal violence, the legal legitimacy of the records are nil and any use of such information that might lead to revelations about terrorists or terrorist activities will be inadmissable in a court of law, contravening Patriot Act efforts to inhibit terrorism. Indeed, the organized, systematic, violent perpetrations by members of the California DMV upon the citizens of America and the residents of the state are themselves just such prohibited acts of terrorism anathema to every concept of lawful democracy, and are committed in service to those "enemies of freedom" that the Patriot Act was intended to protect us from.

The NCIDP adds that, in the extraordinarily unlikely event that DMV information might actually lead to a terrorist but, in turn, become inadmissible 'poison fruit', it would be a rare tragedy that pales in comparison to the tragedies perpetrated upon individuals who are innocent victims of those who have infiltrated the DMV to enact these terrorist assaults daily and by the millions. The infiltrators at the DMV themselves have escaped justice for far too long.