The National Council on Identity Policy (NCIDP) - Firewire News Case Study: Canada & U.S. Security Perimeter Secret Treaty

The National Council on Identity Policy (NCIDP) was born of the struggles of one tenacious survivor of domestic violence and stalking. The NCIDP continues her work with the help of many. Read more about the NCIDP...

(Firewire News) - Canada and the United States have been secretly negotiating a 'Security Perimeter' treaty, more formally known as "Beyond the Border: a shared vision for perimeter security and economic competitiveness". In it, Canada proposes to turn over the records of its citizens to the United States.

This would seem to clearly indicate that Canadians are eager to have ownership of our own property, our identity information, subverted and abused as widely and corruptly, and illegally, as is already done to residents of the United States [U.S. Coast Guard (Vic Complaint)]. As several Firewire News articles published on the NCIDP website as case studies well show [California DMV (RICO), Tax Time Homicides, Auto Dealer Scam part I, Auto Dealer Scam part I, et al.], there is a rampant culture of corrupt entitlement to the stealing of others' identity information present in the United States. It seems Canadians are ready to give up the last of our fading civility and fully join that culture of U.S. identity violence. Perhaps Canada wishes to become the 51^st United State.

Canadians should make no mistake about it: U.S. law protecting identity information, and individuals' rights in their own identity information, is so widely and roundly neglected and abused within the United States, and especially by corrupt state actors, that if Canadians think their privacy and property rights, their rights in their own information will be respected once it crosses the border; Canadians who believe that are completely ignorant of the self-entitled culture of violence and identity violence in the U.S., and had better think again.

Here is the most critical point that Canadians MUST understand about what is going on with identity information under U.S. law within the United States: it doesn't matter any more, not one bit, what the laws on the books say in the United States, the executive branch, the Presidency, of the United States acts with utterly arbitrary and capricious will and intent. The executive branch of the United States no longer feels bound to the legislated laws that govern it, hasn't for quite some time, and may never again; and this is never more true than when on the subject of the rights of individuals in their own private property and personal identity information.

In the United States, they think that committing a million acts of violence against innocent civilians every day is a great idea for the sake of "preventing violence", preventing that one-in-a-billion chance of someone other than the government causing a person harm in some dramatic fashion that we might then call terrorism. If these same people went around wearing trash cans 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, afraid of being struck by lightning, they'd be deemed insane. Well, an individual is more likely to be struck by lightning three times in the same year than to be a victim of what they so fear that they sexually assault and forcibly pornographicize every traveller boarding a plane in the United States (when bomb-sniffing dogs would do a much better job, and non-violently at that). Isn't THAT exactly what they're supposed to be trying to prevent?

The U.S. ideal of universalizing violence to prevent rare and isolated violence only serves to increase the overall levels of social violence and frustration. It is the doom of any civilization.

It is certainly the antithesis of "freedom", that ideal so widely espoused in the United States, but clearly not in real existence there.

Chief among these acts of U.S. paranoid violence is the criminal misappropriation of identity information. It has become so routine and unprosecuted in the United States that some terrorist organizations and other perpetrators there operate quite openly, boastfully flaunting their power to enact terrorist violence unencumbered and protected [Terrorists 'Own' San Francisco].

So, if a treaty with the United States to "give" away the private property of Canadians to the United States looks good just because, on paper, it is couched in "safeguards", ignore those paper so-called "safeguards" for, in every practical application of it, those "safeguards" won't exist. Bet on it.