The National Council on Identity Policy (NCIDP) - Firewire News Case Study: Tax Time Homicides Courtesy of the IRS

The National Council on Identity Policy (NCIDP) was born of the struggles of one tenacious survivor of domestic violence and stalking. The NCIDP continues her work with the help of many. Read more about the NCIDP...

IIULA status:

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is known by the NCIDP to have had previous full notice of a standardized Survivor's Identity Information User License Agreement (IIULA) prior to this incident.

Every breach of law perpetrated in this case, as discussed here and noted in the IIULA, was well known by the IRS to be felony violent assault crimes before those crimes were perpetrated upon the victim of this case.

The perpetrators of this case may not claim any ignorance of these laws, and must be presumed to have perpetrated these violent felony assault crimes with the willing and willful intent to do violence to the victim, including against survivors such as to willfully precipitate homicidal assaults upon such victims.

(Firewire News) – After a woman fled her extremely abusive, obsessive and homicidal partner, representatives of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) themselves made homicidal threats to disclose the woman's whereabouts to the abusive former partner. More than just attempting to enable the gruesome, torturous murder that had been threatened upon the victim, these misanthropic agents of the IRS attempted to engage in other willfully violent identity crimes.

In order to facilitate the earning of income and payment of taxes on that income, the victim was expected to have a tax identification number. In attempting to apply for one, the victim found that, despite the fact that the Privacy Act Notice on the application clearly stated "Disclosure is Voluntary", meaning no Social Security Number (SSN) was necessary, the representatives of the IRS, refused to issue the victim a tax identification number without her acquiring and providing a SSN.

Voluntary means VOLUNTARY, in law just as in English, and it is a multitude of felonies to fail to respect the meaning of "NO". In this case, regarding a SSN, the Privacy Act specifically enumerates the individual's RIGHT to privacy (P.L. 93-579 § 2) and then goes on to more specifically enumerate the individual's RIGHT to WITHHOLD a Social Security Number WITHOUT consequence (P.L. 93-579 § 2).

- Felony #1: It is patently a felony to compel the disclosure of an SSN (or use, as in obtaining in any way without consent) in violation of any federal law, including the Privacy Act above. (42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(8): 5 years imprisonment).

- Felony #2: It is a felony for any State Actor to conspire to deprive anyone of any civil right, including the civil right to privacy and the civil right to withhold a SSN. (18 U.S.C. § 241: 10 years to Life imprisonment).

- Felony #3: It is a felony for anyone to deprive any other person of any civil right under the color of any authority, including the civil right to privacy and the civil right to withhold a SSN. (18 U.S.C. § 242: 1 year to Life imprisonment).

- Felony #4: It is a felony to extort the personal property of another by violence or under color of authority in any way that affects any commerce, and a tax identification number or lack thereof definitely affects commerce. Moreover, not only do we already know that a person's own identity information is their own personal property, but we also already know from the U.S. Supreme Court that it holds a pecuniary value 'greater than any other thing can possibly hold'. (18 U.S.C. § 1951: 20 years imprisonment).

- Felonies #5 & #6: Using the mail and electronic communications to commit crimes are felonies. (18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343: 20 years imprisonment each)

- Felony #7: It is a federal felony to knowingly posses or transfer documentation of any other person's illegally obtained identity information affecting commerce or by mail or issued by the U.S. government; or to possess any documentation of another person's illegally obtained identity information if that documentation was issued by the U.S. government, as with a SSN. Or, as the Department of Justice writes it, when "someone wrongfully obtains and uses another person's personal data in some way that involves fraud or deception". (18 U.S.C. § 1028: 15 years imprisonment).

- Felony #8: It is a federal felony to knowingly possess, use or transfer any other person's personal identity information during or relating to any felony violations involving: mail or wire fraud (#5 & #6, above); or, violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408 (#1, above). (18 U.S.C. § 1028a: 2 years imprisonment).

- Felony #9: It is a RICO felony to conspire to commit crimes above. Moreover, as was decided in the Cianci case, it is a RICO conspiracy even if all of the underlings of the conspiracy who actually carried out the crimes were unaware of the criminal nature of their acts or of the criminal racket itself. (18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968: 20 years to Life).

OF COURSE, not to be left out, threatening to identify the victim and her location to the homicidal ex-partner that she had fled was a murder threat, and a threat to conspire in her murder.

THIS IS ONLY A PARTIAL LIST of the felonies committed by those violent representatives of the IRS. Just these federal felonies listed here earned from 93 years imprisonment to 3 Life imprisonment sentences for these vicious felons and terrorist sympathizers, if not active members of a terrorist cell, who had infiltrated the IRS. The perpetrators are eligible for the 3 Life sentences if indeed their actions precipitated the death of the victim, as was likely, and as the perpetrators knew it to be likely.

DESPITE criminal complaints reported to law enforcement of these violent assault felonies and homicidal threats, these perpetrating representatives of the IRS remain unprosecuted, and are presumably still perpetrating upon innumerable other victims, still causing innumerable deaths.

The presence of these and any other like-minded individuals within the IRS make it patently and wholly unsafe for any survivor of violence to interact with the IRS in any way, including through third-party representative state actors such as employers who choose to participate in withholding and reporting programs with the IRS. Since a significant number of employers do make that choice for some reason, and many of them wrongly believe themselves empowered to make that compulsory upon employees, this can have a significant and dangerous life-limiting impact upon victims of violence working hard to survive that violence.

UPDATE!: During the Presidential primary season, during the race between Obama, Clinton, et al., infiltrators at the IRS were at it again. Widely reported worldwide, several IRS agents "peeked" at the tax returns of the then-candidates for the Democratic nomination, Obama and Clinton. Portrayed so innocuously as "peeking", many news reports failed miserably in reporting that this kind of "peeking" is a routine, normal, habituated practice by infiltrators of not only the IRS, but of virtually every government agency across the country – and that it is rarely as innocuous as the term "peeking" implies. Indeed, at least 95% of all such "peeks" are specifically for nefarious purposes, including murder.

Worse still, both the news reports and the term "peeking" itself grossly gloss over the fact that in each and every case, these "peeks" are a violent assault upon the individual whose information is "peeked".

Reports further indicated that federal prosecutors once again intend to fail miserably in their duties to prosecute those "peekers" for the multiple federal violent assault felonies that they committed, including most of the nine listed at the beginning of the article above, and several others not listed (including 26 U.S.C. § 7213, specifically applicable to tax return information, but also equally applicable to ALL SSN related records pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(c)(2)(C)(viii)).

Clearly, the IRS remains a hotbed of homicidal ideation and terrorist agendas imported by infiltrating aficionados of the ideals of Mr. Kim and Mr. Bin Laden. And clearly federal prosecutors remain sympathetic to those terrorist agendas, and their "fight against terrorism" is left appearing to be a mere facade at best, and perhaps just one giant hoax.

Just as clearly, dealings with the IRS are patently unsafe for anyone needing to remain safe from violence.